Explain Why It Is Difficult to Talk Meaningfully About God Essay Sample free essay sample

Religious linguistic communication is defined as the communicating of thoughts about God. religion. belief and pattern. This definition makes it hard to speak meaningfully approximately it as each of these words have concepts behind them and each and every single interprets these otherwise. so spiritual linguistic communication is different to mundane linguistic communication. as it merely denotes to an individual’s belief and faiths traditions. There are besides many jobs with spiritual linguistic communication as a whole as it anthropomorphises God. by utilizing nomenclature such as ‘Him’ ‘King’ and ‘Shepherd’ this is restricting and topics God to hold human qualities. which is against what The Bible wants to portray God as. Besides another job is that some think that spiritual linguistic communication is cognitive. therefore something must be known about God to speak meaningfully about it. Yet this creates the job that spiritual statem ents are non about nonsubjective facts that can be proved true or false but are replies to inquiries that are unable to be validated. We will write a custom essay sample on Explain Why It Is Difficult to Talk Meaningfully About God Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page as they are based on nonsubjective facts that are unfastened to knowledge. These issues have led to spiritual trusters to happen ways in which they can speak about God in a meaningful manner and the opposite as non-believers are seeking for ways to render spiritual linguistic communication meaningless. A group of philosophers called the logical rationalists who as a group did non seek to understand how we gain cognition of the external universe. but how we use linguistic communication to convey it. They believed that everything that can be verified is meaningful. Thus the confirmation rule was developed which stated that if it could be empirical tested by the five senses so it was meaningful. for illustration. a house is made of gingerbread. is nonmeaningful as it can be proved false by taking rock samples from the house. Yet this causes a job when speaking about philosophical and spiritual facets. The logical rationalists thought it was pointless to speak about art. music. ethic and God as it could neer be verified. so couldn’t be rendered true or false. Therefore it is meaningless as it is used to see things beyond the human experience and this creates the ‘impossibility’ to understand to significance of anything being said. A. J. Ayer ; a logical rationalist introduces two types of confirmation. strong and weak. to cover with the acceptation of scientific and historical propositions which are fighting to see as meaningful or non. Strong confirmation is when there is absolute no uncertainty that a statement is true. as it is verified through sense. for illustration. ‘It is cheery today’ . Yet weak confirmation occurs when some of the observations are non once and for all true or false. for illustration. ‘humans are made of atoms’ as this may be accepted by people who were at the clip of the find. besides future scientific statements are verified by the weak. as they will merely be affirmed in the hereafter non at present. The disproof rule created by Flew. stated that spiritual statements are meaningless as there nil which can number against a spiritual truster. as they will non number or accept any of the grounds against their religion. Criticism ‘dies the decease of a 1000 qualifications’ . For illustration Flew used the narrative of a male parent of a terminally sick kid. prayed for God to do their kid better. but the kid died. the male parent qualifies this by stating it was God’s determination and possibly God’s love is ‘not simply human love’ . Tillich believed that spiritual linguistic communication was meani ngful as it was conveyed through metaphors and symbols. nevertheless philosophers such as Paul Edwards thought that disclosure could non be portrayed through the confirmation rule utilizing empirical grounds hence symbols don’t elude any factual cognition. and are meaningless. Another review of Tillich is that he stated that metaphors and symbols can be mistranslated and over clip the original significance may hold been lost or forgotten hence sing symbols meaningless as the significance may hold been changed from what was originally intended to stand for. Besides with the unfavorable judgment that symbols can be interpreted in any manner the person wants to. this is demising the ultimate truth of world it is seeking to convey as it may indicate in a different way as to which was besides originally intended. Overall. the confirmation and the disproof principles argue that it is non possible to speak about God meaningful manner as it is non possible to turn out the being of God of travel verify any of the statements related to God.